|
Home Page
Temples of Angkor
Siem Reap
Phnom Penh
Sihanoukville
Towns, Villages
and Provinces
Border Crossings
Airports and Airlines
Ground Transportation
(see each city's link also)
River Transportation
(see each city's link also)
Hospitals, Clinics and
Health Services Professionals
Western Union/Money Transfer Points
Maps
The Weather
Travelogues
and Travel Articles
Useful Links
Cambodian
News Articles
New Age News
Earth Changes &
Global Warming
Free Classifieds
Real Estate/Properties
(For Rent - For Sale)
Government Offices
and Ministries
Economic Statistics
Telecommunications,
Post
and Internet Providers
*****
Charles B. Jones
Managing Editor
Cambodian Online

Information
Contact Information
Cambodian
Mobile:
012-247-125
International Mobile:
(855) 12-247-125
24-Aug-2005
Last Edited
|

Welcome to Cambodia's Portal to its mystery and charm!
As you will find,
many pages are incomplete or under construction. We are however making every
effort to keep this site as timely and informative as possible and always
welcome your comments, feedback and observations.
Please enjoy what we all feel to be
one of the most amazing places on
earth...Cambodia!
Charles B. Jones
Editor
Cambodian Online
|
|

Earth
Changes
and
Global
Warming
Home Page
Stop the Corporate Takeover of our Water
Jim Hightower, Hightower Lowdown
July 24, 2002
Viewed on July 29, 2002
-------------------------------------------------------------------
They hang the man and flog the woman
That steal the goose from off the common,
But let the greater villain loose
That steals the common from the goose.
The law demands that we atone
When we take things we do not own,
But leaves the lords and ladies fine
Who take things that are yours and mine.
--English Nursery Rhyme c. 1764
The greater villains are loose in our world today, literally thirsting to
take things that are yours and mine -- and this time they might make off with
the greatest plunder of all: our water.
Yes, the ideologues and greedheads who brought us the fairy tale of energy
deregulation and the Ponzi scheme of Enron are aggressively pushing for
deregulation and privatization of the world's water supplies and systems. They
are determined to turn this essential public resource into another commodity for
traders and speculators -- a private plaything for personal profiteering.
In just the past few years, trans-national conglomerates already have
privatized all or parts of the water systems of Atlanta, Berlin, Buenos Aires,
Bolivia, Casablanca, Charleston, Chattanooga, Ghana, Houston, Jacksonville,
Jersey City, Lexington, New Orleans, Peoria, Ontario, San Francisco, and many
other places.
It amounts to a corporate "water rush." In our country, private control has
rapidly become global control: The largest U.S. firm, American Water Works, was
recently swallowed up by RWE of Germany (which also got Azurix in Enron's fire
sale); Suez Lyonnaise of France took our second biggest company, United Water
Resources; and Vivendi of France grabbed U.S. Filter.
Water gets hot
Two years ago, Fortune magazine exulted that water "will be to the 21st
century what oil was to the 20th." And the magazine was thrilled that "the
liquid everybody needs . . . is going private, creating one of the world's great
business opportunities." Four factors are powering this rush to privatization:
scarcity, greed, ideology, and political weaseliness.
The World Bank predicts that two-thirds of the world's population will run
short of adequate water in the next 20 years. You might think that the sheer
scariness of this scarcity would prompt policy makers to focus on such goals as
protecting the purity of the aqua we have, pushing rational conservation, and
promoting the long-term public interest in this irreplaceable resource.
Whoa there, Pollyanna! You forget greed. Speculators look at the looming
scarcity of a substance that no one can do without and think: "Wow, if I could
control that, I could make a killing." Suddenly, the unsexy task of piping in
water and piping out sewage became a hot prospect.
This coincided nicely with the corporate right wing's ideological zealotry
for the mumbo-jumbo of deregulation and privatization. Not only can
conglomerates do everything better than a democratic government can, goes their
religious mantra, but they firmly believe that today's global corporations are
magical kingdoms run by new-economy wunderkinds.
In Fortune's paean to the corporatization of water, Suez Lyonnaise was
lionized as being "more than a water company. It's a fresh invention." This is
the same gibberish that, until only a year ago, was being heaped on Enron,
Global Crossing, World Com, and other hucksters whose only invention was a new
way to package the age-old shell game.
There's nothing fresh or inventive about global corporate greed thrusting its
way throughout both the industrial and developing worlds to establish empire.
Suez Lyonnaise knows a lot about that. It is the descendant of the corporation
that built the Suez Canal in 1858 under the patronage of Emperor Napoleon III.
Suez marches on, expanding its multibillion-dollar water empire by 10 percent a
year.
As for picky concerns that cities, states, and entire nations ought not
surrender control of their water supply to the whims of corporate empire
builders, the CEO of Suez retorts: "We must rise above national egotism!"
This is where the political weasels come in. From the mid-seventies to the
present, just about every politician from mayoral to presidential candidates of
both major parties have caved in to the privatization ideologues, campaigning
and governing as tight-fisted, no-more-taxes, business-minded conservatives.
So local pols have frittered away public funds on building flashy sports
palaces for privately owned teams, and national pols have cooked up
trillion-dollar tax giveaways to the richest people in the country -- and all of
the pols have let America's crucial water systems fall apart. To fix decades-old
leaking pipes, sputtering pumps, and the other faltering parts of the water
infrastructure will require an estimated $11 billion a year more than
governments now are spending.
Faced with this unpleasantness, weaseling politicians have simply escalated
their weaseling. Rather than being straight with people by saying, "Look, we've
got to get our public house in order," the pols at all levels have thrown open
the doors of our house to any corporate flimflammer with a medicine wagon, a
talking pony, and a bottle of that old magic elixir: Privatization!
Promises, promises
As Bob Dylan sang, "The pump don't work 'cause the vandals took the handle."
In case after case where corporate water vandals have taken the handle to the
public pump, folks have found themselves left with skyrocketing bills, foul
water, lousy service, non-functioning fire hydrants -- and no control over the
culprits.
Anyone thinking that a dose of good old corporate efficiency is just what
their cranky, antiquated utility needs should check out the excellent reports
that Public Citizen has written on the broken promises of water privatization.
Take the case of United Water Resources, which had humble origins as the
Hackensack Water Co. In the mid-nineties, however, the company got ambition,
dressing up in the sleeker corporate name of UWR Inc. and going on an
expansionist binge that quickly made it the second-largest corporate water
fiefdom in the U.S., before UWR itself was swallowed by Suez Lyonnaise last
year.
The company and its executives have hauled in millions in profits and
personal gains from its privatization adventures, but its customers have been
soaked. In Atlanta, UWR promised dramatic cost savings, which it proceeded to
get by whacking the city's water staff from 731 employees to only 327. Among the
"savings" this produced:
-- Debris and rust started turning up in residents' water. At first, UWR
honchos denied there was a problem. But, hey -- the tap water was brown! Even
then, it was four months before the company did anything.
-- Fire hydrants started coming up dry or inoperative. Again, executives
tried to deny that there was a problem. Then, when it was pointed out that this
was life-and-death stuff, UWR tried to shift the blame (and the cost), saying
that after the company repaired or replaced a hydrant, it was the city's
responsibility to test it to see if it actually worked.
-- Complaints piled up about impossibly slow service on everything from
repairing leaks to installing water meters.
Likewise, Jersey City has been hosed by UWR. The company is paid millions in
annual fees to bring its corporate efficiency to this municipal water system,
but instead it has produced a chorus of complaints about billing errors. It
turns out that, as in Atlanta, UWR's "efficiency" is based on cutting staff --
in this case, it subcontracts meter reading to a low-wage firm. No problem,
though, for when the complaints about misread and broken meters roll in, UWR
service representatives have simply been directing irate citizens to municipal
employees.
What a deal -- UWR privatizes the water revenue, but socializes the problems!
Worse, the company is not required by its contract to open its books or justify
its fees. It simply sends a bill, which is not subject to public review.
In Jacksonville, Florida, UWR's ownership and operation of the water system
was so outlandish that citizens have taken it back in a $219 million buyout. In
its brief, five-year stewardship, the corporation's chief efficiency was in
getting rate increases from the Florida utility commission. Monthly bills shot
up by an average of $9.44 in 1997; then the company went back to the trough a
year later for another 12.5% rate hike. By instituting public control, residents
of the Jacksonville area are expected to enjoy an average cut of 25 percent in
their water and sewer bills.
Deprivatization
While most media have gushed about the boundless promise of privatization,
they have been practically mute about one of the most sweeping developments
taking place in water management: deprivatization. As in Jacksonville, officials
in many cities that have sipped the tainted waters of corporate control have
been struggling mightily to regain public control. But it's not easy, for
monopolization of a water market turns out to be a cash cow for corporations,
and once they get it, they cling to it.
-- Chattanooga, Tennessee. American Water Works (now RWE) has owned
Chattanooga's water for a long time, but Mayor Jim Kinsley led a 1998 move to
buy the system, noting that public ownership could cut rates by 25 percent and
save $100 million. There was also the matter of AWW gouging the city on
fire-hydrant fees and a secret effort by corporate executives to export
Chattanooga water to Atlanta. AWW refused to negotiate a sale, instead rushing
to court, launching a massive multimillion-dollar PR campaign, and resorting to
dirty tricks like hiring an agency to snoop on the mayor. Outspent, the city
finally settled, allowing AWW to keep its ownership. But the corporation did
agree to cut fire-hydrant fees from $300 a year per meter to $50, and to submit
any water-exporting scheme to voters for approval.
-- Huber Heights, Ohio. In 1993, a Florida-based company decided to sell its
water holdings, including the water system it owned in this suburb of Dayton.
The city tried to buy it, but couldn't match the deep pockets of American Water
Works. Local folks feared the worst -- and got it. As soon as AWW took control,
it raised rates by a third. It also contracted to deliver two million gallons a
day of Huber Heights' water to an industrial park outside the city. City
officials initiated eminent-domain proceedings to buy back the system.
Once again, AWW ran to court and launched a massive PR campaign, but in a
referendum voters overwhelmingly supported the effort to reclaim their water.
Even after the 1995 buyback, however, AWW has kept the city tied up in legal
knots, requiring that Huber Heights still keep piping its water to the
industrial park.
-- Pekin, Illinois. When Citizens For Locally Owned Water (FLOW) began a
buyout campaign here two years ago, our friends at American Water Works launched
their usual PR blitz, spending a million bucks to assert that city officials
don't have the expertise to run a water system. This was a bit ironic, since AWW
had run the system into the ground, failing to keep up infrastructure, failing
to maintain fire hydrants in working order, and providing slow service -- all
while averaging rate hikes of more than 10 percent a year.
However, AWW's big-money PR hustle won in a narrow victory in a non-binding
referendum, so the buyback is on hold. But FLOW is not going away, and it points
out that at AWW's current rate of infrastructure upgrades, it'll take the
company 268 years to replace Pekin's deteriorating water mains.
Water privatization doesn't work because its fundamental promises are lies.
Far from bringing "market forces" to bear, these corporations are handed a
monopoly and face no competition. Wielding monopoly power, they slash staff,
lower wages, compromise service, cut corners on quality, skimp on long-term
investment, raise rates -- and call this "efficiency." Any savings derived from
these tactics are routed into extravagant executive-pay packages, luxurious
corporate headquarters, bureaucracy for the parent conglomerate, lavish
advertising and lobbying budgets, and profits. All of this is done behind closed
doors, for these private empires are not subject to the open-access and
disclosure rules of public agencies. Then, when the peasants rebel, the faraway
CEO dispatches an army of PR flacks and lawyers, overwhelming the financial
resources available to local citizens and governments.
Buying in bulk
Not content to control our water systems, corporate powers are now selling
the water itself. Through court actions, lobbying, trade deals, and bribery
(campaign contributions), the law is being perverted to turn public bodies of
water into a tradable commodity, like pork bellies. Speculators and corporate
hustlers are claiming a right to buy, sell, extract, and move massive amounts of
fresh water:
-- Texas oilman and corporate raider T. Boone Pickens has just forced a state
water district to authorize him to pump and sell up to 65 billion gallons of
water a year from the Ogallala aquifer, sending it by pipeline to San Antonio,
Dallas, or other water-short cities. The Ogallala, which underlies the Texas
Panhandle and is the water source for the whole area, already is severely
depleted and can't be replenished, but Pickens plans to poke holes into it, mine
the water, and reap colossal profits by selling it to the highest bidder.
-- Keith Brackpool (I don't make up these names), a California corporate
farmer and fat-cat contributor to Governor Gray Davis, also is trying to become
a water baron. With the governor's backing, his Cadiz Inc. proposes to suck
water out of the aquifer underlying federal land in the ecologically fragile
Mojave Desert, then sell some 20 billion gallons of this public groundwater each
year to Southern California cities, reaping up to a billion bucks for Cadiz.
-- Ric Davidge, an Alaskan water-preneur who previously was an aide to the
infamous James Watt, has a deal for San Diego, which imports almost 100 percent
of its water. Davidge wants to siphon some 65 billion gallons of fresh water a
year out of two Northern California rivers, pipe it into inflatable bags bigger
than three football fields, then tow these "bladders" by tugboat to thirsty San
Diego. He says this will save fresh water that otherwise would "disappear" into
the Pacific Ocean. (Hello, Ric -- river water running into the sea is an
essential part of the ecological cycle.) Davidge admits that there are many
questions he can't answer, but, he says, "We need new ideas." New, yes. Loopy,
no.
I suppose it will not surprise you to learn that this global corporate rush
for the "blue gold" of our public water resources is being ably aided and
abetted by our own government.
Deep inside NAFTA, for example, is tucked a little nasty called Chapter 11,
which water corporations already are using to force local governments to break
the dam and turn loose their water for private exploitation. Also, with our
government's blessing, the World Bank and IMF routinely pressure Third World
nations to privatize their water systems.
Now, the White House and Congress are ratcheting up their privatization push
here at home with a sneak attack called the Water Investment Act of 2002.
Despite its boring title, S.1961 contains a stick of dynamite in Section
103(J)(1)(b). This proviso says that a local water project in your city cannot
get federal financing unless the local government "has considered" privatizing
your water system. Upgrading and expanding water systems is hugely expensive,
and cities must have federal support to do the job -- but S.1961 would make this
funding conditional on whether cities consider turning over their water to
private corporations.
This boondoggle is pushed by a powerhouse lobbying outfit called the National
Association of Water Companies, and it means that your local water board will
have to spend your tax dollars offering your public water supply for sale --
knowing that Big Water corporations will sue the hell out of them if they don't
get their way.
Substituting private interest for public interest has not exactly been
serendipitous in the energy sector -- so why in hell should we give corporations
(foreign-based ones, at that) our water? At least government entities are
supposed to be legally and politically responsible to We the People. But
corporations maintain (and the law agrees) that they are responsible solely to
their big stockholders -- an elite group that invariably includes the CEO. In
water, the stockholders' interests inevitably will conflict with the public's.
Plus, corporations are anti-democratic, used to making decisions in secret --
and, as Enron has taught us, hiding their financial shenanigans in a labyrinth
of offshore accounts. Take the case of Azurix, a high-flying water privatizer
that was not really a company but a convoluted consortium of more than 50
limited partnerships and interlocking subsidiaries created in the secretive tax
haven of the Cayman Islands. Its creator was none other than Enron. Now it's
owned by RWE.
Water is one of life's necessities, which is why we must treat it as part of
our commons -- the wealth that we hold in trust so it will be there for all of
us, not only for today, but for all of our tomorrows as well.
|